PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ICMB vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ICMBCRT
YTD Return-4.00%-36.80%
1Y Return4.14%-35.95%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.09%-0.01%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.31%14.59%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.44%-0.81%
Sharpe Ratio0.31-0.90
Sortino Ratio0.66-1.26
Omega Ratio1.080.84
Calmar Ratio0.29-0.54
Martin Ratio1.12-1.08
Ulcer Index8.11%33.39%
Daily Std Dev29.44%40.17%
Max Drawdown-80.34%-83.46%
Current Drawdown-24.66%-60.06%

Fundamentals


ICMBCRT
Market Cap$43.21M$63.00M
EPS-$0.28$1.28
Total Revenue (TTM)-$270.37K$5.98M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$4.08M$9.09M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.48M$2.96M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between ICMB and CRT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ICMB vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ICMB achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -36.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMB has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of -0.44%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.81% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.00%
-18.31%
ICMB
CRT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICMB vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICMB, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICMB, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICMB, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICMB, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICMB, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.51
CRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRT, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRT, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRT, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRT, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRT, currently valued at -1.08, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.08

ICMB vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMB and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
0.14
-0.90
ICMB
CRT

Dividends

ICMB vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

ICMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.86%, more than CRT's 10.33% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
18.86%17.17%16.31%12.22%16.56%14.93%16.00%12.27%15.14%18.14%10.86%0.00%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
10.33%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.46%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%15.34%7.87%

Drawdowns

ICMB vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMB drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMB and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-24.66%
-60.06%
ICMB
CRT

Volatility

ICMB vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) is 4.88%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that ICMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.88%
9.34%
ICMB
CRT

Financials

ICMB vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items