ICMB vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICMB or CRT.
Correlation
The correlation between ICMB and CRT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ICMB vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICMB:
0.23
CRT:
-1.09
ICMB:
0.55
CRT:
-1.67
ICMB:
1.07
CRT:
0.80
ICMB:
0.20
CRT:
-0.65
ICMB:
0.73
CRT:
-1.34
ICMB:
8.74%
CRT:
32.42%
ICMB:
27.91%
CRT:
40.11%
ICMB:
-80.34%
CRT:
-83.46%
ICMB:
-18.07%
CRT:
-62.91%
Fundamentals
ICMB:
$46.53M
CRT:
$58.62M
ICMB:
$0.30
CRT:
$1.13
ICMB:
10.77
CRT:
8.65
ICMB:
$8.68M
CRT:
$10.57M
ICMB:
$4.87M
CRT:
$13.67M
ICMB:
-$6.34M
CRT:
$4.40M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICMB achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -41.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMB has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 1.95%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
ICMB
4.40%
6.44%
1.33%
7.26%
-1.08%
1.95%
CRT
-41.31%
-6.63%
-6.04%
-43.44%
15.53%
1.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICMB vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICMB vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
ICMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, more than CRT's 10.68% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. | 17.20% | 17.72% | 17.02% | 12.73% | 16.56% | 14.93% | 16.00% | 12.27% | 15.14% | 18.14% | 10.86% | 0.00% |
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.68% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
ICMB vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICMB drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMB and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICMB vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) is 7.60%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ICMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ICMB vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities