ICF vs. RWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO).
ICF and RWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. RWO is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. It was launched on May 13, 2008. Both ICF and RWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ICF vs. RWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICF vs. RWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 4.03% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 2.29% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than RWO's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has outperformed RWO with an annualized return of 4.70%, while RWO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.99% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
RWO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICF vs. RWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than RWO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. RWO — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
RWO
ICF vs. RWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICF | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 0.87 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.12 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.82 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 3.57 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICF | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.16 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.15 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and RWO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICF vs. RWO - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than RWO's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.67% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.53% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. RWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than RWO's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and RWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -67.69% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -11.48% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -32.85% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -43.27% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -7.70% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -12.78% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.64% | +0.60% |
Volatility
ICF vs. RWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.43%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 5.13% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 9.03% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 15.54% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 16.98% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 18.19% | +2.40% |