PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWO vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RWO having a 8.10% return and REET slightly higher at 8.23%. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 3.44%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.


RWO

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.51%
1Y
12.29%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
3.44%

REET

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
8.23%
6M
7.98%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
4.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
8.10%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%21.17%-6.04%7.80%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
8.23%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and REET is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014

0.97

The correlation between RWO and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWO vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWO
REET

Real Estate

89.3%
99.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Financial Services

0.8%
0.2%

Technology

0.7%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

RWO
89.3%
REET
99.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RWO
0.8%
REET

-

Financial Services

RWO
0.8%
REET
0.2%

Technology

RWO
0.7%
REET

-

Healthcare

RWO
0.4%
REET

-

Energy

RWO
0.3%
REET

-

Industrials

RWO
0.2%
REET

-

Utilities

RWO
0.0%
REET

-

Basic Materials

RWO

-

REET

-

Communication Services

RWO

-

REET

-

Consumer Defensive

RWO

-

REET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWO vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWOREETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

0.98

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.39

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

4.85

+0.31

RWO vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWOREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.98

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.14

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.21

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.25

-0.08

Drawdowns

RWO vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and REET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWOREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-44.59%

-23.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.04%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-18.02%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-32.11%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

-44.59%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.68%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-9.79%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.50%

-0.06%

Volatility

RWO vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWOREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.88%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

8.87%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

12.10%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.96%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.84%

-0.63%

RWO vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWO vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than REET's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.42%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.34%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, RWO and REET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RWO has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to REET (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs REET's -44.59%.

On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.00% vs 3.44% for RWO. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.00% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 3.34% for RWO.

RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.14% for REET.

REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWO and REET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer