RWO vs. REET
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - RWO tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index while REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWO returned 3.44%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for REET. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
RWO vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RWO having a 8.10% return and REET slightly higher at 8.23%. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 3.44%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.
RWO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
REET
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 11.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
RWO vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 8.10% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 8.23% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and REET is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014 | 0.97 |
The correlation between RWO and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWO vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWO
REET
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
RWO
REET
Consumer Cyclical
RWO
REET
-
Financial Services
RWO
REET
Technology
RWO
REET
-
Healthcare
RWO
REET
-
Energy
RWO
REET
-
Industrials
RWO
REET
-
Utilities
RWO
REET
-
Basic Materials
RWO
-
REET
-
Communication Services
RWO
-
REET
-
Consumer Defensive
RWO
-
REET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
REET
RWO vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 4.85 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.21 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.25 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
RWO vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -44.59% | -23.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -9.04% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -18.02% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -32.11% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -44.59% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -2.68% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -9.79% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.50% | -0.06% |
Volatility
RWO vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.88% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 8.87% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 12.10% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.84% | -0.63% |
RWO vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWO vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than REET's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.42% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.34% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, RWO and REET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RWO has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to REET (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.00% vs 3.44% for RWO. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.00% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 3.34% for RWO.
RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.14% for REET.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer