ICF vs. FREL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL).
ICF and FREL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. FREL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. It was launched on Feb 2, 2015. Both ICF and FREL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICF or FREL.
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and FREL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ICF vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICF:
0.84
FREL:
0.74
ICF:
1.24
FREL:
1.11
ICF:
1.16
FREL:
1.15
ICF:
0.62
FREL:
0.55
ICF:
2.64
FREL:
2.39
ICF:
5.69%
FREL:
5.55%
ICF:
17.95%
FREL:
18.03%
ICF:
-76.73%
FREL:
-42.61%
ICF:
-12.49%
FREL:
-13.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 0.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICF having a 5.59% annualized return and FREL not far behind at 5.58%.
ICF
1.92%
12.12%
-2.53%
15.00%
7.31%
5.59%
FREL
0.34%
11.08%
-4.47%
13.26%
7.41%
5.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICF vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICF vs. FREL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ICF
FREL
ICF vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICF vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FREL's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.62% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 3.30% | 3.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, which is greater than FREL's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and FREL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICF vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 7.16%, while Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FREL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.