PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 3.44%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


RWO

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.51%
1Y
12.29%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
3.44%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
8.10%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%21.17%-6.04%7.80%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and SCHD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.68

The correlation between RWO and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWO
SCHD

Real Estate

89.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
6.3%

Financial Services

0.8%
9.3%

Technology

0.7%
16.4%

Healthcare

0.4%
18.8%

Energy

0.3%
16.2%

Industrials

0.2%
7.5%

Utilities

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Real Estate

RWO
89.3%
SCHD

-

Consumer Cyclical

RWO
0.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Financial Services

RWO
0.8%
SCHD
9.3%

Technology

RWO
0.7%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

RWO
0.4%
SCHD
18.8%

Energy

RWO
0.3%
SCHD
16.2%

Industrials

RWO
0.2%
SCHD
7.5%

Utilities

RWO
0.0%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

RWO

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

RWO

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

RWO

-

SCHD
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWOSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

2.57

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

3.98

-2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

6.17

-4.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

15.20

-10.04

RWO vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWOSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.57

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.59

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.77

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.86

-0.70

Drawdowns

RWO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWOSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-33.37%

-34.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-4.61%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-16.13%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-16.85%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

-33.37%

-9.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-1.40%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-3.32%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.87%

+0.57%

Volatility

RWO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that RWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWOSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.92%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

7.66%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

10.96%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

14.38%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.72%

+1.49%

RWO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.34%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWO has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 3.44% for RWO. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.

RWO is categorized as REIT, while SCHD is Dividend. RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWO and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer