PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICF vs. IYR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICF vs. IYR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than IYR's 9.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICF having a 5.86% annualized return and IYR not far behind at 5.74%.


ICF

1D
0.73%
1M
0.47%
YTD
15.27%
6M
14.79%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
5.86%

IYR

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.69%
1Y
11.00%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
5.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. IYR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
15.27%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
9.52%3.38%4.41%11.89%-25.51%38.74%-5.23%28.21%-4.33%9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and IYR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2001

0.97

The correlation between ICF and IYR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICF vs. IYR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICF
IYR

Real Estate

100.0%
97.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

ICF
100.0%
IYR
97.9%

Basic Materials

ICF

-

IYR
1.3%

Communication Services

ICF

-

IYR
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ICF

-

IYR

-

Consumer Defensive

ICF

-

IYR

-

Energy

ICF

-

IYR

-

Financial Services

ICF

-

IYR

-

Healthcare

ICF

-

IYR

-

Industrials

ICF

-

IYR

-

Technology

ICF

-

IYR

-

Utilities

ICF

-

IYR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICF vs. IYR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IYR
IYR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. IYR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICFIYRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.29

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

4.04

+0.92

ICF vs. IYR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the IYR Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and IYR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICFIYRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.83

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.14

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.28

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.33

-0.01

Drawdowns

ICF vs. IYR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, roughly equal to the maximum IYR drawdown of -74.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and IYR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICFIYRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-74.13%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-8.54%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-17.52%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-33.75%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-42.32%

+2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.47%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-12.90%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.73%

+0.15%

Volatility

ICF vs. IYR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) have volatilities of 4.13% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICFIYRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.97%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

9.52%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

13.32%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.72%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

20.32%

+0.27%

ICF vs. IYR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than IYR's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICF vs. IYR - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IYR's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.41%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
2.19%2.48%2.57%2.75%2.92%2.06%2.58%3.05%3.53%3.73%4.41%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ICF and IYR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ICF has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to IYR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs IYR's -74.13%.

On 10-year performance, ICF leads with 5.86% vs 5.74% for IYR. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IYR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ICF has performed better with a 5.86% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYR.

ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 2.19% for IYR.

ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.42% for IYR.

ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and IYR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer