ICF vs. XLRE
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both REIT funds - ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index while XLRE tracks the Real Estate Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.86%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for XLRE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLRE.
Performance
ICF vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than XLRE's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed XLRE with an annualized return of 5.86%, while XLRE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.96% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
XLRE
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 10.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
ICF vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 15.27% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 11.53% | 2.63% | 5.09% | 12.36% | -26.25% | 46.10% | -2.18% | 28.68% | -2.39% | 10.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and XLRE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ICF and XLRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICF vs. XLRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICF
XLRE
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
ICF
XLRE
Basic Materials
ICF
-
XLRE
Communication Services
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Consumer Defensive
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Energy
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Financial Services
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Healthcare
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Industrials
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Technology
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Utilities
ICF
-
XLRE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
XLRE
ICF vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICF | XLRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.30 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 3.56 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICF | XLRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.80 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and XLRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | XLRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -38.83% | -37.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.33% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -16.74% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -34.12% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -38.83% | -1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -9.60% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.03% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ICF vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | XLRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.10% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 9.87% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 13.59% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 19.08% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 20.40% | +0.19% |
ICF vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than XLRE's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.41% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.43% | 3.31% | 3.70% | 2.61% | 3.15% | 3.06% | 3.78% | 3.25% | 4.22% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ICF and XLRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ICF has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to XLRE (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs XLRE's -38.83%.
On 10-year performance, XLRE leads with 6.96% vs 5.86% for ICF. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLRE has performed better with a 6.96% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.41% for ICF.
ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.13% for XLRE.
ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and XLRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer