PortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. VNQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and VNQ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RWO vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RWO:

0.79

VNQ:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

RWO:

1.19

VNQ:

1.17

Omega Ratio

RWO:

1.16

VNQ:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

RWO:

0.58

VNQ:

0.60

Martin Ratio

RWO:

2.11

VNQ:

2.46

Ulcer Index

RWO:

6.26%

VNQ:

5.84%

Daily Std Dev

RWO:

16.50%

VNQ:

18.17%

Max Drawdown

RWO:

-68.60%

VNQ:

-73.07%

Current Drawdown

RWO:

-11.66%

VNQ:

-12.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 2.83%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.35% annualized return.


RWO

YTD

4.52%

1M

2.06%

6M

-2.83%

1Y

12.93%

3Y*

0.73%

5Y*

6.48%

10Y*

2.83%

VNQ

YTD

1.30%

1M

1.12%

6M

-7.18%

1Y

13.84%

3Y*

0.66%

5Y*

6.90%

10Y*

5.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard Real Estate ETF

RWO vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.12% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWO vs. VNQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RWO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RWO is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RWO is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RWO is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RWO is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RWO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VNQ is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VNQ is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VNQ is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VNQ is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VNQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VNQ is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RWO vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and VNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RWO vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than VNQ's 4.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%3.08%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
4.07%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%3.60%

Drawdowns

RWO vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -68.60%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and VNQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RWO vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 4.21%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...