PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a -22.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.31%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.36% annualized return.


ICE

1D
-4.25%
1M
-17.05%
YTD
-22.60%
6M
-22.92%
1Y
-30.16%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
11.31%

QQQ

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.09%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
22.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
-22.60%9.92%17.46%27.12%-23.91%19.94%26.15%24.47%8.11%26.60%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.89%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ICE and QQQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between ICE and QQQ has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICE
ICE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICEQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.33

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

2.77

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.06

10.21

-12.28

ICE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is -1.32, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.94%

-82.97%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.10%

-11.96%

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.10%

-22.77%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-35.12%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.32%

-35.12%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.10%

-3.89%

-29.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-32.72%

+16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.63%

3.24%

+11.39%

Volatility

ICE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is 8.54%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that ICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

9.02%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

14.55%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.88%

17.91%

+4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

22.69%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

22.41%

-0.13%

Dividends

ICE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.61%1.19%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to ICE (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICE dropped -73.94% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer