PortfoliosLab logo
ICE vs. LNC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ICE and LNC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ICE vs. LNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ICE:

1.62

LNC:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

ICE:

2.26

LNC:

1.01

Omega Ratio

ICE:

1.34

LNC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ICE:

2.30

LNC:

0.40

Martin Ratio

ICE:

6.66

LNC:

2.32

Ulcer Index

ICE:

4.91%

LNC:

9.72%

Daily Std Dev

ICE:

18.66%

LNC:

41.04%

Max Drawdown

ICE:

-73.94%

LNC:

-92.87%

Current Drawdown

ICE:

-1.17%

LNC:

-45.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ICE:

$101.10B

LNC:

$5.88B

EPS

ICE:

$4.83

LNC:

$7.07

PE Ratio

ICE:

36.49

LNC:

4.87

PEG Ratio

ICE:

2.91

LNC:

1.24

PS Ratio

ICE:

10.69

LNC:

0.32

PB Ratio

ICE:

3.61

LNC:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

ICE:

$12.05B

LNC:

$18.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ICE:

$6.98B

LNC:

-$335.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ICE:

$6.14B

LNC:

$1.54B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than LNC's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has outperformed LNC with an annualized return of 15.64%, while LNC has yielded a comparatively lower -1.82% annualized return.


ICE

YTD

18.61%

1M

11.10%

6M

13.96%

1Y

28.86%

5Y*

15.19%

10Y*

15.64%

LNC

YTD

11.72%

1M

13.71%

6M

0.22%

1Y

20.51%

5Y*

4.74%

10Y*

-1.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICE vs. LNC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICE is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICE is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICE is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICE is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICE is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICE is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNC is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNC is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ICE vs. LNC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the LNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and LNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ICE vs. LNC - Dividend Comparison

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than LNC's 5.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.04%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%1.19%
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
5.23%5.68%6.67%5.86%2.46%3.18%2.51%2.57%1.51%1.51%1.59%1.11%

Drawdowns

ICE vs. LNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, smaller than the maximum LNC drawdown of -92.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and LNC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ICE vs. LNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is 6.26%, while Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that ICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ICE vs. LNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Lincoln National Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
3.23B
4.69B
(ICE) Total Revenue
(LNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ICE vs. LNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Lincoln National Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
55.1%
-1.7%
(ICE) Gross Margin
(LNC) Gross Margin
ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.

LNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported a gross profit of -80.00M and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.

LNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported an operating income of -949.00M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.2%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 797.00M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

LNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported a net income of -722.00M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of -15.4%.