ICE vs. CME

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than CME's 15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has underperformed CME with an annualized return of 15.25%, while CME has yielded a comparatively higher 16.06% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the CME Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and CME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CME's 3.92% yield.

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, roughly equal to the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and CME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to CME Group Inc. (CME) at 7.40%. This indicates that ICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.