ICE vs. JPM
ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — ICE in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges, JPM in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, ICE returned 12.62%/yr vs 21.80%/yr for JPM. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ICE vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 12.62%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.80% annualized return.
ICE
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 14.66%
- 6M
- -11.65%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 1Y
- -16.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.35%
JPM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 33.72%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $688.42M | $623.20M | $636.51M | |
| $2.69B | $3.19B | $3.04B |
ICE vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | -5.20% | 9.92% | 17.46% | 27.12% | -23.91% | 19.94% | 26.15% | 24.47% | 8.11% | 26.60% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 10.73% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICE and JPM is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.41 |
The correlation between ICE and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ICE:
$85.99B
JPM:
$942.62B
ICE:
$7.06
JPM:
$23.29
ICE:
21.59
JPM:
15.10
ICE:
2.61
JPM:
1.67
ICE:
6.48
JPM:
3.30
ICE:
2.92
JPM:
2.78
ICE:
$13.42B
JPM:
$297.63B
ICE:
$10.01B
JPM:
$186.33B
ICE:
$6.36B
JPM:
$90.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICE vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
ICE
JPM
ICE vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICE | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.36 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 3.24 | -4.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICE vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, roughly equal to the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICE | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.94% | -76.16% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.94% | -15.47% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.94% | -24.42% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.32% | -38.77% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.32% | -43.63% | +9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -1.54% | -16.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -17.56% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.71% | 6.51% | +10.20% |
Volatility
ICE vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.60%. This indicates that ICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICE | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 6.60% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.61% | 16.70% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 22.50% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 24.46% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 27.33% | -4.91% |
Dividends
ICE vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than JPM's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 1.31% | 1.19% | 1.21% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.13% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.71% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Financials
ICE vs. JPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ICE vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison
ICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.82B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
JPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 54.83B and revenue of 82.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
ICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.5%.
JPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 27.52B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.
ICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 958.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
JPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 21.16B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICE and JPM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICE has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to JPM (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICE dropped -73.94% vs JPM's -76.16%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICE and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer