PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ICE vs. NDAQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ICENDAQ
YTD Return22.98%35.76%
1Y Return42.74%48.61%
3Y Return (Ann)6.44%5.27%
5Y Return (Ann)12.47%19.52%
10Y Return (Ann)14.91%20.30%
Sharpe Ratio2.662.60
Sortino Ratio3.563.59
Omega Ratio1.511.47
Calmar Ratio2.462.17
Martin Ratio17.1715.47
Ulcer Index2.53%3.18%
Daily Std Dev16.34%18.92%
Max Drawdown-73.94%-68.48%
Current Drawdown-6.25%-2.27%

Fundamentals


ICENDAQ
Market Cap$89.61B$45.79B
EPS$4.21$1.66
PE Ratio37.0747.99
PEG Ratio2.484.22
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.19B$7.02B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.61B$4.02B
EBITDA (TTM)$5.20B$2.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between ICE and NDAQ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ICE vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a 22.98% return, which is significantly lower than NDAQ's 35.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has underperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of 14.91%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.82%
26.37%
ICE
NDAQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICE vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICE, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICE, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICE, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICE, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICE, currently valued at 17.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.17
NDAQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NDAQ, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NDAQ, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NDAQ, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NDAQ, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NDAQ, currently valued at 15.47, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.47

ICE vs. NDAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the NDAQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICE and NDAQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.66
2.60
ICE
NDAQ

Dividends

ICE vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison

ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than NDAQ's 1.18% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.13%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%1.19%0.29%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.18%1.48%1.27%1.99%4.38%5.18%6.25%5.70%5.41%4.64%3.63%3.92%

Drawdowns

ICE vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, which is greater than NDAQ's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and NDAQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.25%
-2.27%
ICE
NDAQ

Volatility

ICE vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) at 5.34%. This indicates that ICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.60%
5.34%
ICE
NDAQ

Financials

ICE vs. NDAQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items