IBUY vs. HACK
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBUY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the EQM Online Retail Index, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 11.07%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for HACK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
IBUY vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 11.07%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
IBUY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
HACK
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
IBUY vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -9.12% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 19.40% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 7.03% | 41.51% | 23.39% | 6.61% | 19.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and HACK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IBUY and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IBUY vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
HACK
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
HACK
-
Communication Services
IBUY
HACK
-
Technology
IBUY
HACK
Financial Services
IBUY
HACK
Healthcare
IBUY
HACK
-
Industrials
IBUY
HACK
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
HACK
-
Real Estate
IBUY
HACK
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
HACK
-
Energy
IBUY
-
HACK
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
HACK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
HACK
IBUY vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBUY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.69 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 1.61 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -42.68% | -30.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -20.67% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -21.90% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -38.68% | -32.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -38.68% | -34.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -8.93% | -42.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -11.62% | -18.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 8.80% | +2.19% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) is 6.65%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that IBUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 11.83% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | 21.94% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 26.06% | -4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 24.30% | +7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 23.25% | +5.93% |
IBUY vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and HACK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to IBUY (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs HACK's -42.68%.
On 10-year performance, HACK leads with 15.64% vs 11.07% for IBUY. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HACK has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
IBUY has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
IBUY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities. IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.60% for HACK.
HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer