IBTG vs. GGOV
IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBTG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
IBTG vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.47% return.
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTG vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 1.44% | 2.21% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.47% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and GGOV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTG vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTG
GGOV
IBTG vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTG | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 20.36 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 63.25 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 255.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTG | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.08 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTG | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -4.69% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.34% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -1.59% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTG vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTG | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52% | 5.39% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.27% | 5.39% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 5.39% | -1.94% |
IBTG vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTG vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 3.96% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTG and GGOV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
IBTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
IBTG is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTG and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for IBTG and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer