IBTG vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
IBTG and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both IBTG and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTG or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and BND is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBTG vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBTG:
2.75
BND:
0.76
IBTG:
4.32
BND:
1.11
IBTG:
1.60
BND:
1.13
IBTG:
0.55
BND:
0.29
IBTG:
14.45
BND:
1.89
IBTG:
0.32%
BND:
2.07%
IBTG:
1.66%
BND:
5.17%
IBTG:
-13.63%
BND:
-18.84%
IBTG:
-3.74%
BND:
-8.49%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.95% return.
IBTG
0.34%
0.25%
1.44%
4.70%
N/A
N/A
BND
0.95%
0.90%
-1.34%
4.12%
-0.70%
1.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTG vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBTG
BND
IBTG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than BND's 3.68% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.09% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.68% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.25%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.