IBTG vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
IBTG and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. Both IBTG and BIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTG or BIL.
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and BIL is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBTG vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBTG:
2.75
BIL:
20.69
IBTG:
4.32
BIL:
260.89
IBTG:
1.60
BIL:
151.63
IBTG:
0.55
BIL:
460.87
IBTG:
14.45
BIL:
4,244.76
IBTG:
0.32%
BIL:
0.00%
IBTG:
1.66%
BIL:
0.24%
IBTG:
-13.63%
BIL:
-0.77%
IBTG:
-3.74%
BIL:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 0.55% return.
IBTG
0.34%
0.25%
1.44%
4.70%
N/A
N/A
BIL
0.55%
0.33%
2.31%
5.02%
2.42%
1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTG vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTG vs. BIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBTG
BIL
IBTG vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTG vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than BIL's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.09% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.93% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTG vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) has a higher volatility of 0.25% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that IBTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.