PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBTG vs. TI5G.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IBTGTI5G.L
YTD Return3.17%4.22%
1Y Return5.06%5.57%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.41%1.28%
Sharpe Ratio2.512.29
Sortino Ratio4.053.73
Omega Ratio1.541.50
Calmar Ratio0.592.06
Martin Ratio12.5518.98
Ulcer Index0.45%0.30%
Daily Std Dev2.25%2.52%
Max Drawdown-13.63%-5.63%
Current Drawdown-4.81%-0.64%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between IBTG and TI5G.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than TI5G.L's 4.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.89%
2.81%
IBTG
TI5G.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
Expense ratio chart for TI5G.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%
Expense ratio chart for IBTG: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBTG, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBTG, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IBTG, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBTG, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IBTG, currently valued at 11.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.21
TI5G.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TI5G.L, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TI5G.L, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TI5G.L, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TI5G.L, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TI5G.L, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.23

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTG Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTG and TI5G.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.37
1.03
IBTG
TI5G.L

Dividends

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than TI5G.L's 7.70% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
IBTG
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF
4.02%3.61%2.06%0.65%0.53%0.00%0.00%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
7.70%5.19%31.51%34.35%3.06%3.28%70.29%

Drawdowns

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, which is greater than TI5G.L's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and TI5G.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.81%
-5.83%
IBTG
TI5G.L

Volatility

IBTG vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.27%, while iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.27%
2.73%
IBTG
TI5G.L