IBTG vs. IBTA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L).
IBTG and IBTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. IBTA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Apr 13, 2017. Both IBTG and IBTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTG or IBTA.L.
Key characteristics
| IBTG | IBTA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.17% | 3.45% |
| 1Y Return | 5.06% | 5.03% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.41% | 1.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.51 | 2.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.05 | 4.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 2.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.55 | 13.78 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.45% | 0.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.25% | 1.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.63% | -5.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.81% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and IBTA.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than IBTA.L's 3.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBTG and IBTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while IBTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.02% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.65% | 0.53% |
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -5.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and IBTA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTG vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.27%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.