IBIT vs. GLTR
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -39.67% vs 38.86% for GLTR. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
IBIT vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's -4.66% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -21.94%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -39.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IBIT vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 24.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and GLTR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
GLTR
IBIT vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.22 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.17 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 2.88 | -4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -55.70% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -34.09% | -18.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -31.27% | -18.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -28.82% | +12.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.64% | 13.86% | +15.78% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 10.43%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.07% | 10.43% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.45% | 36.24% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 38.40% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 23.87% | +26.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 20.64% | +29.62% |
IBIT vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIT vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBIT nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and GLTR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 1-year performance, GLTR leads with 38.86% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 38.86% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
IBIT and GLTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLTR is Precious Metals. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.60% for GLTR.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer