IAU vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IAU (iShares Gold Trust) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAU returned 12.31%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

IAU vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 12.31%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.

IAU

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -9.54%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 6M: -2.22%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 29.07%
• 5Y*: 17.23%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

CIBR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 8.89%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 18.53%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IAU iShares Gold Trust	-2.44%	63.95%	26.85%	12.84%	-0.63%	-4.00%	25.03%	17.98%	-1.76%	12.91%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	19.63%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and CIBR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.05

IAU vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IAU	CIBR
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.5%
Technology	-	94.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IAU vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU

IAU Risk / Return Rank: 26
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 21
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IAU	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.69	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.11	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.14	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	0.79	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.83	1.86	+0.98

IAU vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IAU vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAU	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.14%	-33.89%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.40%	-21.99%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.40%	-21.99%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.40%	-33.89%	+9.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.40%	-33.89%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.03%	-9.53%	-12.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.97%	-8.66%	-7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.47%	9.38%	-0.91%

Volatility

IAU vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is 7.70%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that IAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAU	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	12.35%	-4.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.94%	21.72%	+2.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.17%	25.16%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.16%	25.04%	-6.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	23.65%	-7.63%

IAU vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAU vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.48%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IAU and CIBR in my portfolio?

IAU and CIBR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IAU or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, IAU or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.88% vs 12.31% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IAU or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IAU or CIBR?

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IAU or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

What is the main difference between IAU and CIBR?

IAU is categorized as Gold, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.