PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD vs. PHYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.61% return.


HYSD

1D
0.07%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.37%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PHYD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.88%7.74%0.97%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
2.61%8.84%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSD and PHYD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.77

The correlation between HYSD and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD
HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYD
PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSDPHYDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.57

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.65

4.11

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.53

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

3.99

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.37

16.58

+2.78

HYSD vs. PHYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PHYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD and PHYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSDPHYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.57

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

1.76

-0.01

Drawdowns

HYSD vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum PHYD drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD and PHYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSDPHYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-4.33%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.10%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.51%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-0.62%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.50%

-0.17%

Volatility

HYSD vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) at 0.93%. This indicates that HYSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSDPHYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.93%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

2.50%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

3.31%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.52%

4.58%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.52%

4.58%

-1.06%

HYSD vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSD vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison

HYSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than PHYD's 9.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.79%5.60%1.82%0.00%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
9.01%6.63%6.80%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD and PHYD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSD has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to PHYD (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSD dropped -2.69% vs PHYD's -4.33%.

On 1-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.46% vs 6.54% for HYSD. On fees, HYSD is cheaper at 0.44% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYSD is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.01%, compared with 5.79% for HYSD.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for HYSD and 0.55% for PHYD.

PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD and PHYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer