HYSD vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HYSD (Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYSD is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, HYSD returned 5.94% vs 6.24% for LDRH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYSD charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.

Performance

HYSD vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 2.08% return.

HYSD

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 5.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 6.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HYSD Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.97%	7.74%	-0.02%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	2.08%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSD and LDRH is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	0.81

The correlation between HYSD and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HYSD vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD

HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 77
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 86
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYSD	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.41	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.89	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	5.09	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.66	21.08	-3.41

HYSD vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYSD vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum LDRH drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYSD	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-3.17%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.46%	-1.23%	-0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.16%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-0.24%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.30%	+0.04%

Volatility

HYSD vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.60%. This indicates that HYSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYSD	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.60%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	1.97%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	2.61%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.50%	3.48%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.50%	3.48%	+0.02%

HYSD vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYSD vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

HYSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than LDRH's 6.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HYSD Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF	5.79%	5.60%	1.82%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.98%	6.41%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYSD and LDRH in my portfolio?

HYSD and LDRH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYSD or LDRH?

HYSD has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to LDRH (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSD dropped -2.69% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, HYSD or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.24% vs 5.94% for HYSD. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYSD or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.24% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYSD or LDRH?

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for HYSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYSD or LDRH?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 5.79% for HYSD.

What is the main difference between HYSD and LDRH?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for HYSD and 0.35% for LDRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.