PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD vs. IBHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD vs. IBHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than IBHH's 2.18% return.


HYSD

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.32%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.56%

IBHH

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.69%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$178.36K$174.11K$125.44K
$2.03M$2.31M$2.52M

HYSD vs. IBHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYSD and IBHH is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.76

The correlation between HYSD and IBHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD vs. IBHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYSD
HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHH
IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYSD vs. IBHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSDIBHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

4.31

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.12

17.21

-2.10

HYSD vs. IBHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IBHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD and IBHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSD vs. IBHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum IBHH drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD and IBHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSDIBHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-12.05%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-1.22%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.09%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-2.22%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.31%

+0.03%

Volatility

HYSD vs. IBHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) is 0.46%, while iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that HYSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSDIBHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.63%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

2.14%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

2.74%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.42%

7.14%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.42%

7.14%

-3.72%

HYSD vs. IBHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSD vs. IBHH - Dividend Comparison

HYSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than IBHH's 6.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.35%5.60%1.82%0.00%0.00%
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
5.68%6.39%6.93%6.65%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD and IBHH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBHH has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to HYSD (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSD dropped -2.69% vs IBHH's -12.05%.

On 1-year performance, IBHH leads with 5.22% vs 5.07% for HYSD. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 5.22% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for HYSD.

IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 5.35% for HYSD.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for HYSD and 0.35% for IBHH.

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD and IBHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer