PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMC vs. SVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HYMC vs. SVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 21.23% return.


HYMC

1D
0.09%
1M
-29.20%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
647.60%
3Y*
99.37%
5Y*
-4.20%
10Y*

SVM

1D
-7.51%
1M
-20.20%
YTD
21.23%
6M
17.83%
1Y
140.00%
3Y*
53.92%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
16.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMC vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
-1.56%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.35%
SVM
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
21.23%179.29%14.88%-10.33%-20.60%-43.52%18.54%172.27%-16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and SVM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018

0.34

Over the past year, HYMC and SVM have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HYMC:

$2.10B

SVM:

$2.23B

EPS

HYMC:

-$1.44

SVM:

-$0.05

PB Ratio

HYMC:

9.38

SVM:

2.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

HYMC:

$0.00

SVM:

$437.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HYMC:

-$4.65M

SVM:

$254.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

HYMC:

-$69.17M

SVM:

$185.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMC vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SVM
SVM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYMCSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

3.61

+7.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.26

9.64

+16.61

HYMC vs. SVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 5.52, which is higher than the SVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and SVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYMC vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and SVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMCSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-98.00%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.07%

-39.02%

-22.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.45%

-42.86%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.90%

-62.98%

-30.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.21%

-48.92%

-36.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-71.59%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.84%

14.57%

+10.27%

Volatility

HYMC vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) have volatilities of 26.56% and 27.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMCSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.56%

27.03%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.12%

57.80%

+28.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.45%

70.44%

+48.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.82%

56.00%

+96.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.79%

61.93%

+60.86%

Dividends

HYMC vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison

HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SVM
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
0.25%0.30%0.83%0.95%0.84%0.66%0.37%0.44%1.19%0.76%0.43%2.13%

Financials

HYMC vs. SVM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Silvercorp Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
145.32M
(HYMC) Total Revenue
(SVM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMC and SVM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVM has higher volatility (27.03%) compared to HYMC (26.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs SVM's -98.00%.

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMC and SVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer