HYMC vs. AEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).
Performance
HYMC vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYMC vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 48.09% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.02% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 19.95% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | 3.27% |
Fundamentals
HYMC:
$1.52B
AEM:
$102.04B
HYMC:
-$1.24
AEM:
$8.83
HYMC:
7.13
AEM:
4.12
HYMC:
$0.00
AEM:
$11.87B
HYMC:
$0.00
AEM:
$6.80B
HYMC:
-$27.62M
AEM:
$8.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 48.09% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 19.95% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- 15.52%
- 1M
- -30.12%
- YTD
- 48.09%
- 6M
- 467.74%
- 1Y
- 986.42%
- 3Y*
- 101.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
AEM
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -19.18%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 89.16%
- 3Y*
- 61.82%
- 5Y*
- 30.88%
- 10Y*
- 20.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
AEM
HYMC vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYMC | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.40 | 2.04 | +6.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.76 | 2.33 | +2.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.33 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 22.74 | 3.14 | +19.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.73 | 10.90 | +48.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYMC | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40 | 2.04 | +6.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.85 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.18 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and AEM is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HYMC vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.81% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than AEM's maximum drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and AEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -90.49% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.18% | -28.97% | -17.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.83% | -46.76% | -49.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.75% | -19.51% | -58.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.04% | -46.76% | -16.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 8.35% | +9.24% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 38.10% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 16.46%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.10% | 16.46% | +21.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.95% | 35.61% | +61.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.82% | 43.99% | +74.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.55% | 36.39% | +116.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.75% | 37.45% | +86.30% |
Financials
HYMC vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities