HYLS vs. CIBR
HYLS (First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYLS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. HYLS is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYLS returned 4.35%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLS charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
HYLS vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HYLS has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 4.35%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.
HYLS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
HYLS vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLS First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF | 0.28% | 8.00% | 5.85% | 13.66% | -12.83% | 3.69% | 5.32% | 14.66% | -2.46% | 6.39% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLS and CIBR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HYLS and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLS vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
HYLS
CIBR
HYLS vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYLS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.06 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 1.56 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.18 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 2.79 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYLS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.06 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.66 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.79 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HYLS vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -33.89% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -21.99% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.96% | -21.99% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.75% | -33.89% | +18.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | -33.89% | +10.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -2.81% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -8.66% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 9.25% | -8.52% |
Volatility
HYLS vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) is 1.16%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that HYLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 10.90% | -9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 20.90% | -18.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 24.50% | -20.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 24.95% | -18.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 23.60% | -16.90% |
HYLS vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLS vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
HYLS First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF | 6.70% | 6.38% | 6.25% | 5.98% | 7.38% | 5.48% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.81% | 5.53% | 5.37% | 6.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLS and CIBR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to HYLS (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLS dropped -22.99% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 4.35% for HYLS. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for HYLS.
HYLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
HYLS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for HYLS and 0.60% for CIBR.
HYLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYLS and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer