PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HYLS vs. EIFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HYLS and EIFAX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.40%
4.33%
HYLS
EIFAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HYLS:

2.15

EIFAX:

3.21

Sortino Ratio

HYLS:

3.06

EIFAX:

9.12

Omega Ratio

HYLS:

1.42

EIFAX:

2.90

Calmar Ratio

HYLS:

3.08

EIFAX:

10.84

Martin Ratio

HYLS:

12.76

EIFAX:

47.14

Ulcer Index

HYLS:

0.63%

EIFAX:

0.18%

Daily Std Dev

HYLS:

3.75%

EIFAX:

2.70%

Max Drawdown

HYLS:

-22.99%

EIFAX:

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

HYLS:

-0.07%

EIFAX:

-0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HYLS has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 3.96%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.11% annualized return.


HYLS

YTD

1.42%

1M

0.35%

6M

3.40%

1Y

8.17%

5Y*

3.00%

10Y*

3.96%

EIFAX

YTD

0.38%

1M

0.28%

6M

4.33%

1Y

8.66%

5Y*

5.42%

10Y*

5.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYLS vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
Expense ratio chart for HYLS: current value at 1.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.01%
Expense ratio chart for EIFAX: current value at 0.47% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.47%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HYLS vs. EIFAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYLS is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYLS is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYLS is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYLS is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYLS is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYLS is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EIFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EIFAX is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.153.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.069.12
The chart of Omega ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.422.90
The chart of Calmar ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.0810.84
The chart of Martin ratio for HYLS, currently valued at 12.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.7647.14
HYLS
EIFAX

The current HYLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLS and EIFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.15
3.21
HYLS
EIFAX

Dividends

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than EIFAX's 8.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
5.65%6.26%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%5.78%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
8.81%8.91%9.33%5.92%4.03%4.52%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.03%5.29%4.79%

Drawdowns

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and EIFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.07%
-0.30%
HYLS
EIFAX

Volatility

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) have volatilities of 0.73% and 0.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.73%
0.74%
HYLS
EIFAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab