PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLS vs. EIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
-1.29%8.00%5.85%13.66%-12.83%3.69%5.32%14.66%-2.46%6.39%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
-1.88%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%0.28%5.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HYLS has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.39%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.15% annualized return.


HYLS

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
4.39%

EIFAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYLS vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYLS vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLS
HYLS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HYLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYLSEIFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

0.82

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.20

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.22

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.06

3.93

+3.13

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLS and EIFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLSEIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.82

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.50

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.16

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.17

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between HYLS and EIFAX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, less than EIFAX's 7.40% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
6.67%6.38%6.25%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
7.40%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%

Drawdowns

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and EIFAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLSEIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-40.28%

+17.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-2.45%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

-7.63%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-24.22%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-2.18%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-2.28%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.79%

+0.02%

Volatility

HYLS vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.85%. This indicates that HYLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYLSEIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

0.85%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

1.83%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

3.31%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

3.10%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

4.45%

+2.25%