HXDM.TO vs. PHYS
HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) is International Equity fund tracking the Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, HXDM.TO returned 10.52%/yr vs 20.77%/yr for PHYS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HXDM.TO is traded in CAD, while PHYS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PHYS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXDM.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 2.93% return.
HXDM.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PHYS
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 32.84%
- 3Y*
- 31.50%
- 5Y*
- 20.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXDM.TO Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.69% | 24.06% | 11.07% | 15.09% | -8.78% | 10.16% | 4.59% | 15.19% | -7.21% | 5.87% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 2.93% | 56.43% | 37.29% | 10.49% | 5.19% | -5.70% | 21.80% | 12.33% | 5.61% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXDM.TO and PHYS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.02 |
The correlation between HXDM.TO and PHYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank
HXDM.TO
PHYS
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXDM.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.82 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 4.49 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXDM.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.22 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXDM.TO and PHYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXDM.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -36.76% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -18.09% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.65% | -18.09% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.87% | -18.09% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -16.20% | +14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -13.90% | +9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 7.33% | -4.39% |
Volatility
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 5.51%. This indicates that HXDM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXDM.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 5.51% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 22.48% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 26.17% | -11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 17.08% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 15.69% | -0.27% |
Dividends
HXDM.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXDM.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXDM.TO and PHYS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HXDM.TO and PHYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer