PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) and HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXDM.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HXEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXDM.TO returned 10.52%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for HXEM.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXDM.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXEM.TO.

Performance

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXDM.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than HXEM.TO's 28.95% return.

HXDM.TO

1D
-0.48%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.69%
6M
9.95%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
—

HXEM.TO

1D
-0.87%
1M
11.29%
YTD
28.95%
6M
29.50%
1Y
56.68%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HXDM.TO
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF		9.69%24.06%11.07%15.09%-8.78%10.16%9.81%
HXEM.TO
Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF		28.95%26.46%14.53%7.09%-16.39%-2.71%12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020

0.61

The correlation between HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HXDM.TO
HXEM.TO

Financial Services

16.0%

-

Industrials

14.7%

-

Healthcare

14.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Technology

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Real Estate

3.1%
16.6%

Financial Services

HXDM.TO
16.0%
HXEM.TO

-

Industrials

HXDM.TO
14.7%
HXEM.TO

-

Healthcare

HXDM.TO
14.4%
HXEM.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXDM.TO
11.8%
HXEM.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXDM.TO
10.2%
HXEM.TO

-

Technology

HXDM.TO
8.8%
HXEM.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXDM.TO
7.5%
HXEM.TO

-

Communication Services

HXDM.TO
6.2%
HXEM.TO

-

Utilities

HXDM.TO
3.9%
HXEM.TO

-

Energy

HXDM.TO
3.4%
HXEM.TO

-

Real Estate

HXDM.TO
3.1%
HXEM.TO
16.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF

Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HXDM.TO:
HXDM.TO vs. HXS.TOHXDM.TO vs. XEF.TOHXDM.TO vs. QDXH.TOHXDM.TO vs. XEQT.TOHXDM.TO vs. VXM.TOHXDM.TO vs. ZEA.TOHXDM.TO vs. TPU.TO
Often compared with HXEM.TO:
HXEM.TO vs. XEC.TOHXEM.TO vs. ZEM.TOHXEM.TO vs. HXT.TOHXEM.TO vs. VEE.TOHXEM.TO vs. XEM.TOHXEM.TO vs. XEMC.TOHXEM.TO vs. XSEM.TO

Return for Risk

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HXDM.TO
HXDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO
HXEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) and Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HXDM.TOHXEM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
2.91

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.09
3.72

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.53

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.61

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

16.65

-9.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the HXEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HXDM.TOHXEM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.91

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.58

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.65

-0.06

Drawdowns

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum HXEM.TO drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HXDM.TOHXEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-35.00%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-12.34%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.65%

-15.40%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

-30.44%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.87%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-13.75%

+9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.41%

-0.47%

Volatility

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) is 5.80%, while Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that HXDM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HXDM.TOHXEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

8.38%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

17.05%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

19.60%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

17.03%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

16.95%

-1.53%

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXDM.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HXEM.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXDM.TO nor HXEM.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXDM.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXDM.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXEM.TO.

HXDM.TO is categorized as International Equity, while HXEM.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. HXDM.TO tracks Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return), while HXEM.TO tracks Global X Emerging Markets Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HXDM.TO and 0.25% for HXEM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXDM.TO and HXEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer