HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUTL.TO returned 8.55%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.91% return.

HUTL.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.39%
• 6M: 11.72%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: —

CINF.TO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 16.22%
• YTD: 17.91%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	11.11%	15.59%	14.70%	3.11%	-4.97%	16.04%	5.70%
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	17.91%	12.54%	16.53%	5.27%	5.03%	13.56%	7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and CINF.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020	0.38

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUTL.TO	CINF.TO
Utilities	40.5%	40.5%
Communication Services	40.3%	1.8%
Energy	15.8%	16.7%
Industrials	3.4%	31.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	9.8%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTL.TO

HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CINF.TO

CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTL.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.31	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.16	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.42	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	4.15	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	12.29	-3.36

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and CINF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTL.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.00%	-12.27%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-5.31%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.91%	-9.62%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	-12.27%	-7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-0.35%	-1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.59%	-2.05%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.79%	-0.06%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 1.98%. This indicates that HUTL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTL.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	1.98%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	7.78%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.73%	9.55%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.04%	11.96%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	12.08%	+3.14%

Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than CINF.TO's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	2.41%	2.80%	3.06%	3.45%	3.51%	3.56%	2.27%	0.00%
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	7.69%	7.94%	8.30%	8.56%	8.13%	7.16%	7.73%	6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTL.TO and CINF.TO in my portfolio?

HUTL.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HUTL.TO and CINF.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI.