CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO
CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) and XUT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. CINF.TO is actively managed, while XUT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CINF.TO returned 12.72%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for XUT.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CINF.TO having a 17.12% return and XUT.TO slightly higher at 17.34%.
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- —
XUT.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.12% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 5.03% | 13.56% | 7.55% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 17.34% | 14.74% | 13.09% | -0.45% | -11.02% | 8.92% | 17.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF.TO and XUT.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CINF.TO
XUT.TO
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.00 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 8.52 | +3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum XUT.TO drawdown of -37.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF.TO and XUT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -37.65% | +25.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -7.64% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -17.51% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.27% | -28.54% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -1.15% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -5.79% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.69% | -0.90% |
Volatility
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) at 2.10%. This indicates that CINF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.10% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 6.75% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 8.82% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 12.78% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 16.16% | -4.05% |
Dividends
CINF.TO vs. XUT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than XUT.TO's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 3.16% | 3.91% | 4.00% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.04% | 4.51% | 3.57% | 4.52% | 3.57% | 3.74% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF.TO and XUT.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.
Find the right allocation for CINF.TO and XUT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer