CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. CINF.TO is actively managed, while UMVP.TO is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CINF.TO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 17.12%
• 6M: 17.36%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: —

UMVP.TO

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -1.35%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	14.56%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CINF.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF.TO

CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

UMVP.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CINF.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	—	—

Drawdowns

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF.TO and UMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CINF.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-4.57%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-3.44%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-0.85%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CINF.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.58%	9.42%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.97%	9.42%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.11%	9.42%	+2.69%

Dividends

CINF.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than UMVP.TO's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	2.42%	2.80%	3.06%	3.45%	3.51%	3.56%	2.27%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	1.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CINF.TO and UMVP.TO in my portfolio?

CINF.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between CINF.TO and UMVP.TO?

They also come from different issuers: CI and Hamilton.