HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO).
HUTL.TO and XUT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. XUT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011.
Performance
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 11.42% | 15.59% | 14.70% | 3.11% | -4.97% | 16.04% | -10.64% | 13.96% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 11.15% | 14.58% | 12.92% | -0.58% | -11.12% | 8.75% | 14.46% | 28.55% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HUTL.TO having a 11.42% return and XUT.TO slightly lower at 11.15%.
HUTL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XUT.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than XUT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUTL.TO
XUT.TO
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUTL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 2.18 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.76 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.92 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 8.08 | +3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUTL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.18 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.47 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTL.TO and XUT.TO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than XUT.TO's 3.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF | 7.34% | 7.94% | 8.30% | 8.56% | 8.13% | 7.16% | 7.73% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF | 3.45% | 3.79% | 3.86% | 3.76% | 3.66% | 2.89% | 4.28% | 3.38% | 4.29% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum XUT.TO drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and XUT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -37.66% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -7.66% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -28.65% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.19% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -5.87% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.77% | -1.10% |
Volatility
HUTL.TO vs. XUT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUTL.TO | XUT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.47% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 7.07% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 9.95% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 12.69% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 16.27% | -0.98% |