CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO
CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) and HUTS.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. CINF.TO is actively managed, while HUTS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CINF.TO returned 17.25%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for HUTS.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINF.TO achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than HUTS.TO's 15.42% return.
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HUTS.TO
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.12% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 2.47% |
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 15.42% | 21.29% | 9.40% | -3.91% | -12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF.TO and HUTS.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2022 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CINF.TO and HUTS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CINF.TO
HUTS.TO
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF.TO | HUTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 5.02 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 15.34 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum HUTS.TO drawdown of -30.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF.TO and HUTS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF.TO | HUTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -30.57% | +18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -5.84% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -20.25% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -4.77% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -9.89% | +7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.91% | -0.12% |
Volatility
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) is 2.59%, while Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that CINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF.TO | HUTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 4.12% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 8.36% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 9.93% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 14.98% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 14.98% | -2.87% |
Dividends
CINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than HUTS.TO's 5.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% |
HUTS.TO Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF | 5.69% | 6.45% | 7.45% | 7.83% | 2.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF.TO and HUTS.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for CINF.TO and HUTS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer