HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO).

HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. HUTE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022.

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	11.42%	15.59%	14.70%	3.11%	5.02%
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	12.55%	19.04%	18.15%	0.09%	7.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 12.55% return.

HUTL.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 19.38%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

HUTE.TO

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

HUTL.TO

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF

HUTE.TO

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF

Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTL.TO

HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUTL.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.55	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.04	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.37	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	9.38	+2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUTL.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.55	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.17	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than HUTE.TO's 8.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	7.34%	7.94%	8.30%	8.56%	8.13%	7.16%	7.73%	5.33%
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	8.09%	9.64%	10.24%	10.70%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTL.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.00%	-18.36%	-15.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-9.03%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-2.57%	+1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-3.94%	-2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	2.29%	-0.62%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 3.63%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTL.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	4.61%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.70%	7.87%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.62%	13.94%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	14.26%	-1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	14.26%	+1.03%