PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO).

HUTL.TO and ZWU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUTL.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. ZWU.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF		11.42%15.59%14.70%3.11%-4.97%16.04%-10.64%13.96%
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF		11.68%13.18%10.97%-2.79%-3.89%15.80%-7.09%16.73%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HUTL.TO having a 11.42% return and ZWU.TO slightly higher at 11.68%.

HUTL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
11.42%
6M
12.52%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
—

ZWU.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.62%
YTD
11.68%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF

BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF

Often compared with HUTL.TO:
HUTL.TO vs. HUTE.TOHUTL.TO vs. ZUT.TOHUTL.TO vs. FTSHUTL.TO vs. FTS.TOHUTL.TO vs. XUT.TOHUTL.TO vs. UTIL.TOHUTL.TO vs. HDIV.TO
Often compared with ZWU.TO:
ZWU.TO vs. ZUT.TOZWU.TO vs. UMAX.TOZWU.TO vs. UTES.TOZWU.TO vs. ZWC.TOZWU.TO vs. PAYF.TOZWU.TO vs. SYLD.TOZWU.TO vs. VDY.TO

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWU.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF

Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO
ZWU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZWU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HUTL.TOZWU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.89

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.43

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.66

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

9.91

+1.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the ZWU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and ZWU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HUTL.TOZWU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.89

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.70

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.46

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.43

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and ZWU.TO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than ZWU.TO's 6.92% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF		7.34%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%5.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF		6.92%7.59%7.96%8.54%8.35%7.43%7.94%6.29%6.84%6.46%6.77%7.57%

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum ZWU.TO drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and ZWU.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HUTL.TOZWU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-37.41%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.71%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-23.36%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.41%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.37%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-5.42%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.80%

-0.13%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that HUTL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HUTL.TOZWU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

2.41%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

5.28%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

9.12%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

10.34%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

14.15%

+1.14%