PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUMN vs. XHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUMN vs. XHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than XHR's 48.59% return.


HUMN

1D
-3.72%
1M
-15.58%
YTD
7.60%
6M
9.53%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XHR

1D
2.01%
1M
19.39%
YTD
48.59%
6M
43.94%
1Y
70.86%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. XHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF
7.60%20.70%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
48.59%17.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and XHR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUMN vs. XHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN
HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XHR
XHR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. XHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUMNXHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

4.39

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

13.02

-8.83

HUMN vs. XHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the XHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and XHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. XHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum XHR drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and XHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUMNXHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.40%

-71.02%

+50.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-16.23%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.45%

0.00%

-17.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-26.00%

+21.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

5.46%

+1.33%

Volatility

HUMN vs. XHR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) at 6.29%. This indicates that HUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUMNXHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

6.29%

+6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.77%

20.09%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.44%

27.69%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.44%

34.53%

-3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

42.47%

-11.03%

Dividends

HUMN vs. XHR - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than XHR's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF
0.67%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
2.69%3.96%3.23%2.94%1.52%0.00%1.81%5.09%6.40%5.09%5.66%5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUMN and XHR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUMN has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to XHR (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -20.40% vs XHR's -71.02%.

XHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUMN and XHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer