HUMN vs. SMH
HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. HUMN is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
HUMN vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return.
HUMN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
HUMN vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 18.42% | 20.70% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 31.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMN and SMH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.71 |
HUMN vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUMN
SMH
Industrials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
HUMN
SMH
-
Technology
HUMN
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
HUMN
SMH
-
Basic Materials
HUMN
SMH
-
Communication Services
HUMN
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
HUMN
-
SMH
-
Energy
HUMN
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
HUMN
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
HUMN
-
SMH
-
Utilities
HUMN
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
HUMN
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUMN vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
HUMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
HUMN vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUMN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.60 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUMN vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.40% | -84.96% | +64.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.15% | -2.81% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -41.04% | +36.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility
HUMN vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUMN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 33.20% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 35.47% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 32.82% | -2.15% |
HUMN vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUMN vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.61% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUMN and SMH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for HUMN and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer