HUMN vs. SGOL

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). HUMN is actively managed, while SGOL is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SGOL.

Performance

HUMN vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than SGOL's 0.17% return.

HUMN

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 22.34%
• 6M: 24.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGOL

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -4.92%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 30.05%
• 5Y*: 18.58%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	22.34%	20.70%
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	0.17%	29.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and SGOL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SGOL

SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 27
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	SGOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.95	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.32	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.02	—

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and SGOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	SGOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-45.51%	+25.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-19.96%	+13.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-18.41%	+13.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	SGOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.78%	27.20%	+3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.78%	18.14%	+12.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.78%	16.06%	+14.72%

HUMN vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.59%	0.72%
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and SGOL in my portfolio?

HUMN and SGOL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or SGOL?

On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or SGOL?

SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or SGOL?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.

What is the main difference between HUMN and SGOL?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while SGOL is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.17% for SGOL.