PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SGOL vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SGOLPHYS
YTD Return21.68%22.98%
1Y Return30.97%31.21%
3Y Return (Ann)11.06%10.71%
5Y Return (Ann)10.65%10.20%
10Y Return (Ann)6.92%6.58%
Sharpe Ratio2.132.13
Daily Std Dev14.23%14.29%
Max Drawdown-45.51%-48.16%
Current Drawdown-0.37%-0.31%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between SGOL and PHYS is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SGOL vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 21.68% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 22.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGOL having a 6.92% annualized return and PHYS not far behind at 6.58%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
16.38%
16.82%
SGOL
PHYS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF

Sprott Physical Gold Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SGOL vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGOL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SGOL, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SGOL, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SGOL, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SGOL, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SGOL, currently valued at 12.70, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.70
PHYS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 12.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.23

SGOL vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which roughly equals the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SGOL and PHYS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.13
2.13
SGOL
PHYS

Dividends

SGOL vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGOL nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.37%
-0.31%
SGOL
PHYS

Volatility

SGOL vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 3.48%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%6.00%6.50%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.92%
3.48%
SGOL
PHYS