SGOL vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
SGOL and AAAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGOL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018. Both SGOL and AAAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SGOL or AAAU.
Performance
SGOL vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SGOL having a 23.91% return and AAAU slightly higher at 23.98%.
SGOL
23.91%
-4.27%
5.89%
29.08%
11.63%
7.64%
AAAU
23.98%
-5.84%
5.89%
29.10%
11.57%
N/A
Key characteristics
| SGOL | AAAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.08 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.79 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.76 | 3.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.62 | 12.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.42% | 2.42% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.69% | 14.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.51% | -21.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.11% | -8.12% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGOL vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and AAAU is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SGOL vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SGOL vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGOL nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SGOL vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.