SGOL vs. AAAU
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both Gold funds - SGOL tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) while AAAU tracks the LBMA Gold PM Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGOL returned 19.05%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for AAAU. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.
Performance
SGOL vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGOL having a -1.56% return and AAAU slightly lower at -1.62%.
SGOL
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- -14.09%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 29.62%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.62%
AAAU
- 1D
- 4.09%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- -14.12%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.25M | $44.13M | $64.18M | |
| $86.81M | $80.44M | $100.71M |
SGOL vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -1.56% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | 7.23% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -1.62% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 12.96% | -0.50% | -4.01% | 25.02% | 18.17% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and AAAU is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2018 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SGOL and AAAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
AAAU
SGOL vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 2.06 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -26.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -26.29% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.32% | -26.29% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -26.29% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.32% | -26.29% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.34% | -21.33% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.46% | -6.55% | -11.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 12.40% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) have volatilities of 7.10% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 7.06% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 19.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 28.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 18.42% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 17.28% | -1.14% |
SGOL vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGOL vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGOL nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SGOL and AAAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGOL has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to AAAU (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs AAAU's -26.29%.
On 5-year performance, AAAU leads with 19.06% vs 19.05% for SGOL. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 19.06% return vs 19.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AAAU.
SGOL and AAAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.18% for AAAU.
SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer