HUMN vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. HUMN is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 28.43% vs 29.97% for QQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

HUMN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.28% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -15.58%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: 15.28%
• 6M: 13.51%
• 1Y: 29.97%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 15.81%
• 10Y*: 21.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	7.60%	20.70%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	15.28%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and QQQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

The correlation between HUMN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUMN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	QQQ
Industrials	36.7%	2.6%
Technology	26.2%	58.7%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	11.4%
Basic Materials	6.9%	1.0%
Communication Services	2.1%	14.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 28
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 26
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.68	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.25	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	2.52	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	9.22	-5.03

HUMN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-82.97%	+62.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	-11.96%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.45%	-5.21%	-12.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-32.71%	+27.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.79%	3.26%	+3.53%

Volatility

HUMN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.11%. This indicates that HUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.01%	9.11%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.77%	14.62%	+11.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.44%	17.97%	+13.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.44%	22.69%	+8.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.44%	22.40%	+9.04%

HUMN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.67%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and QQQ in my portfolio?

HUMN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUMN or QQQ?

HUMN has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to QQQ (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -20.40% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or QQQ?

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 29.97% vs 28.43% for HUMN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or QQQ?

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 29.97% return vs 28.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or QQQ?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

What is the main difference between HUMN and QQQ?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.