HUMN vs. HOOW

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 19.31% vs -15.98% for HOOW. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.

Performance

HUMN vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -18.40% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -15.23%
• 6M: -5.67%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOW

• 1D: -7.08%
• 1M: -6.65%
• 6M: -14.48%
• YTD: -18.40%
• 1Y: -15.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.87%	20.70%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-18.40%	37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and HOOW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.46

HUMN vs. HOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	HOOW
Industrials	38.4%	-
Technology	26.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.4%	-
Financial Services	3.6%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 22
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	HOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	-0.19	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	0.31	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.04	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	-0.24	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	-0.41	+2.91

HUMN vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the HOOW Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and HOOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and HOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	HOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-65.74%	+43.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.61%	-65.74%	+43.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.61%	-44.58%	+21.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-30.55%	+25.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	39.41%	-31.67%

Volatility

HUMN vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) is 15.86%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 25.15%. This indicates that HUMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	HOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.86%	25.15%	-9.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.96%	64.80%	-35.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.09%	84.42%	-50.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.38%	84.12%	-50.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.38%	84.12%	-50.74%

HUMN vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than HOOW's 143.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	143.26%	67.92%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.72%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and HOOW in my portfolio?

HUMN and HOOW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUMN or HOOW?

HOOW has higher volatility (25.15%) compared to HUMN (15.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -22.61% vs HOOW's -65.74%.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or HOOW?

On 1-year performance, HUMN leads with 19.31% vs -15.98% for HOOW. On fees, HUMN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HUMN has been the lower-risk option at 15.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or HOOW?

Over the 1-year period, HUMN has performed better with a 19.31% return vs -15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or HOOW?

HUMN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or HOOW?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 143.26%, compared with 0.72% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between HUMN and HOOW?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.99% for HOOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HUMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.