PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOW vs. HOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOW vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than HOOY's -6.44% return.


HOOW

1D
-2.94%
1M
47.20%
YTD
-14.70%
6M
-20.92%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOY

1D
-2.53%
1M
27.13%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
-10.93%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-14.70%52.60%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
-6.44%30.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and HOOY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.98

The correlation between HOOW and HOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOW vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW
HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOWHOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.38

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

0.66

+0.10

HOOW vs. HOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the HOOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and HOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than HOOY's maximum drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and HOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOWHOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.74%

-51.54%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.74%

-51.54%

-14.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.07%

-30.28%

-11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-20.76%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.05%

29.31%

+8.74%

Volatility

HOOW vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 28.68% compared to YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) at 18.25%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOWHOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.68%

18.25%

+10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.22%

42.06%

+20.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.38%

56.26%

+28.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.14%

54.47%

+29.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.14%

54.47%

+29.67%

HOOW vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOW and HOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

HOOW vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, less than HOOY's 148.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
136.33%67.92%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
148.68%82.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, HOOW and HOOY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HOOW has higher volatility (28.68%) compared to HOOY (18.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs HOOY's -51.54%.

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with 28.92% vs 19.41% for HOOY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, HOOY has been the lower-risk option at 18.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a 28.92% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOW and HOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

HOOY has the higher dividend yield at 148.68%, compared with 136.33% for HOOW.

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HOOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOW and HOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer