HOOW vs. HOOD
HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, HOOW returned -24.25% vs -13.35% for HOOD. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together.
Performance
HOOW vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -31.68% return, which is significantly lower than HOOD's -23.47% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -27.79%
- 6M
- -20.03%
- YTD
- -31.68%
- 1Y
- -24.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
HOOD
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -23.21%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 1Y
- -13.35%
- 3Y*
- 88.76%
- 5Y*
- 19.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.93B | $2.33B | $2.54B | |
| $4.69M | $5.55M | $5.41M |
HOOW vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -31.68% | 52.60% |
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -23.47% | 50.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and HOOD is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 1.00 |
The correlation between HOOW and HOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
HOOD
HOOW vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOW | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.28 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | -0.47 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. HOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, smaller than the maximum HOOD drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and HOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -90.21% | +24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.74% | -57.26% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.60% | -43.22% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -60.10% | +28.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.51% | 33.81% | +6.70% |
Volatility
HOOW vs. HOOD - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 21.12% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) at 17.67%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.12% | 17.67% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.47% | 53.55% | +11.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.98% | 70.22% | +14.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.74% | 73.87% | +9.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.74% | 73.91% | +9.83% |
Dividends
HOOW vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 167.55%, while HOOD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 167.55% | 67.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, HOOW and HOOD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HOOW has higher volatility (21.12%) compared to HOOD (17.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs HOOD's -90.21%.
HOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOW and HOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer