PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBS vs. RACE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUBS vs. RACE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than RACE's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed RACE with an annualized return of 14.57%, while RACE has yielded a comparatively higher 25.24% annualized return.


HUBS

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-53.16%
6M
-50.00%
1Y
-66.10%
3Y*
-28.43%
5Y*
-18.40%
10Y*
14.57%

RACE

1D
-2.93%
1M
10.50%
YTD
-1.73%
6M
-1.08%
1Y
-21.64%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
25.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBS vs. RACE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-53.16%-42.41%20.02%100.79%-56.14%66.27%150.12%26.06%42.23%88.09%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
-1.73%-11.65%26.34%59.12%-16.68%13.32%39.71%67.87%-4.47%81.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBS and RACE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between HUBS and RACE has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUBS:

$9.88B

RACE:

$62.93B

EPS

HUBS:

$1.91

RACE:

€8.98

PE Ratio

HUBS:

98.67

RACE:

34.15

PEG Ratio

HUBS:

0.11

RACE:

1.77

PS Ratio

HUBS:

3.00

RACE:

7.58

PB Ratio

HUBS:

4.95

RACE:

13.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBS:

$3.30B

RACE:

€7.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBS:

$2.76B

RACE:

€3.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBS:

$196.96M

RACE:

€3.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBS vs. RACE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

RACE
RACE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RACE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RACE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RACE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RACE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RACE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBS vs. RACE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUBSRACEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.90

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.59

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.66

-0.93

-0.74

HUBS vs. RACE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the RACE Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBS and RACE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. RACE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than RACE's maximum drawdown of -46.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and RACE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBSRACEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-46.67%

-32.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.09%

-39.22%

-28.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.16%

-39.22%

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-39.22%

-39.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-39.22%

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.94%

-29.85%

-48.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-11.50%

-11.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.95%

25.02%

+15.93%

Volatility

HUBS vs. RACE - Volatility Comparison

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Ferrari N.V. (RACE) at 12.55%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RACE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBSRACEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.45%

12.55%

+14.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.03%

24.53%

+30.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.97%

35.36%

+27.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.02%

29.55%

+25.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.98%

29.55%

+21.43%

Dividends

HUBS vs. RACE - Dividend Comparison

HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RACE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
2.40%1.85%0.61%0.59%0.69%0.40%0.54%0.70%0.88%0.61%0.79%

Financials

HUBS vs. RACE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Ferrari N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
881.00M
1.86B
(HUBS) Total Revenue
(RACE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HUBS values in USD, RACE values in EUR

HUBS vs. RACE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HubSpot, Inc. and Ferrari N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
83.5%
51.8%
Portfolio components
HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

RACE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a gross profit of 961.64M and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

RACE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported an operating income of 554.10M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

RACE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a net income of 414.57M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUBS and RACE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to RACE (12.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs RACE's -46.67%.

RACE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBS and RACE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer