HUBS vs. GLD
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 14.57%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUBS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 14.57%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
HUBS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and GLD is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.03 |
The correlation between HUBS and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
GLD
HUBS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.18 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 0.98 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | 2.81 | -4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -45.56% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.09% | -24.46% | -43.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.16% | -24.46% | -53.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.99% | -24.46% | -54.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.99% | -24.46% | -54.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.94% | -22.05% | -55.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.21% | -16.16% | -7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.95% | 8.49% | +32.46% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 7.79%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | 7.79% | +19.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.03% | 24.10% | +30.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.97% | 27.37% | +35.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.02% | 18.22% | +36.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.98% | 16.08% | +34.90% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUBS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and GLD have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs GLD's -45.56%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer