HTEC vs. QRFT
HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. HTEC is passively managed, while QRFT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTEC returned -5.86%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for QRFT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTEC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QRFT.
Performance
HTEC vs. QRFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than QRFT's 9.72% return.
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
QRFT
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC vs. QRFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 8.28% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.72% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.05% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTEC and QRFT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HTEC and QRFT has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HTEC vs. QRFT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTEC
QRFT
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
HTEC
QRFT
Financial Services
HTEC
QRFT
Technology
HTEC
QRFT
Industrials
HTEC
QRFT
Energy
HTEC
QRFT
Basic Materials
HTEC
-
QRFT
Communication Services
HTEC
-
QRFT
Consumer Cyclical
HTEC
-
QRFT
Consumer Defensive
HTEC
-
QRFT
Real Estate
HTEC
-
QRFT
Utilities
HTEC
-
QRFT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTEC vs. QRFT — Risk / Return Rank
HTEC
QRFT
HTEC vs. QRFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTEC | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.72 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 11.53 | -7.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTEC vs. QRFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than QRFT's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and QRFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTEC | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.53% | -30.19% | -27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.31% | -9.12% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -19.99% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.10% | -28.20% | -27.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.59% | -2.89% | -28.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -6.76% | -22.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 2.15% | +4.66% |
Volatility
HTEC vs. QRFT - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) at 5.79%. This indicates that HTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTEC | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.79% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 11.14% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 14.00% | +6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 17.48% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 20.13% | +5.33% |
HTEC vs. QRFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QRFT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTEC vs. QRFT - Dividend Comparison
HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than QRFT's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTEC and QRFT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to QRFT (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs QRFT's -30.19%.
On 5-year performance, QRFT leads with 10.89% vs -5.86% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 10.89% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.
HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.26% for QRFT.
HTEC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QRFT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.75% for QRFT.
QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTEC and QRFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer