HTEC vs. BETZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ).
HTEC and BETZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTEC is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2019. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. Both HTEC and BETZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HTEC or BETZ.
Correlation
The correlation between HTEC and BETZ is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HTEC vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HTEC:
0.40
BETZ:
0.67
HTEC:
0.68
BETZ:
1.05
HTEC:
1.08
BETZ:
1.13
HTEC:
0.14
BETZ:
0.25
HTEC:
1.92
BETZ:
2.40
HTEC:
3.77%
BETZ:
5.31%
HTEC:
18.28%
BETZ:
19.13%
HTEC:
-57.53%
BETZ:
-60.82%
HTEC:
-44.00%
BETZ:
-40.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's 11.53% return.
HTEC
3.57%
2.58%
5.88%
4.57%
1.82%
N/A
BETZ
11.53%
-2.37%
12.90%
11.92%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTEC vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HTEC vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HTEC vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither HTEC nor BETZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
HTEC vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and BETZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HTEC vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 5.43%. This indicates that HTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.